china-defense-mashup

Female members of PLA Guard of Honor

The first group of 13 female members of the People's Liberation Army Guard of Honor made their debut on May 2014

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  • Previous
  • Next

CHINA MILITARY PHOTOS

Anti-Ballistic Target Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

 

Chinese 4th Fighter Cockpit Concept

 

HJ-12 Anti-tank Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

5 stars hotels in in Guangzhou

NextPrev

CHINA DEFENSE MANUFACTURE

CASIC - Aerospace Science & Industry Shenzhen (Group) Co.,LTD
ShenzhenWork Phone: -88266100Work Email: 

FEATURED

VIDEOS

  • Chinese Top Gun, a great MV of PLA Navy J-15 and Liaoning Carrier

    1 Comment 22127 Views

    Chinese Top Gun from smallcat on Vimeo.

    Read More »
  • 6 minutes great lunar-landing video from Chang’e-3 probe camera

    0 20666 Views

  • Video: Chinese military not allowing Indian troops to patrol LAC

    0 24816 Views

  • Video: Liaoning Carrier defends Diaoyu Island in Chinese online game

    0 31887 Views

  • China develops fire-fighting missile system

    0 36013 Views

  • 3 stars hotels in in Guangzhou


CHINESE DEFENSE INDUSTRY NEWS

  • Chinese BrahMos?CX-1 Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 77 Views

     

    Read More »
  • Chengfei to buy AVIC’s military assets for $2.5 bln

    0 10841 Views

  • Can China’s Defense Industry be innovative like U.S. ?

    4 Comments 18747 Views

  • EU firms involve in China’s military buildup

    0 13227 Views

  • Spa hotels in in Guangzhou


  • New Cameroonian naval vessels under construction in China

    0 8695 Views

CHINA MILITARY NEWS

  • First Photo Chinese CZ-5 (Long March-5) Rocket

    0 7 Views

     

    Read More »
  • Chinese 4th Fighter Cockpit Concept

    0 2784 Views

  • HJ-12 Anti-tank Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 6 Views

  • Hotels with pool in in Guangzhou


  • PLA Navy J-15 Fighter Model in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 1048 Views

  • SH-1 Truck Gun in 2014 Zhuahai Air Show

    0 437 Views

  • HQ-16 SAM Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 450 Views

  • Poly 07PD 105mm Wheeled Gun in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 446 Views

  • WS-10 “Taihang” Turbofan Engine in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 489 Views

  • FK-3 SAM Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 918 Views

  • Best budget hotels in in Guangzhou


  • JH-7A Bomber in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 1742 Views

  • PLA Air Force Unknown hunter-killer UAV in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 1331 Views

  • CH-4 UCAV in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 1606 Views

  • CM-708 Sub-launched Anti-ship Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 690 Views

  • H-6M Bomber in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

    0 1661 Views

  • Y-8 Medium Transporter in 2014 Zhuhai Airshow

    0 623 Views

RECENT POSTS

  • The clearest satellite photos of China’s Island Construction in South China Sea

  • First Photo Chinese CZ-5 (Long March-5) Rocket

  • Leibao-6C Mobile SAM System in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

  • ZKD-03 AEW Aircraft Model in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

  • CSK002 airborne assault vehicle

  • Chinese anti-diver rocket launcher in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

  • CS 30mm Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Gun in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

  • Anti-Ballistic Target Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

  • Chinese 4th Fighter Cockpit Concept

  • HJ-12 Anti-tank Missile in 2014 Zhuhai Air Show

  • Popular Hotels in Guangzhou


RECENT COMMENTS

GIRLS IN UNIFORM



POPULAR POSTS

CHINA’S AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEVELOPMENT

CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER

Can China’s Defense Industry be innovative like U.S. ?

Chinese J-31 stealth fighter

Within this very broad framework, states can structure their defense innovation system in a variety of ways. One increasingly important question involves the role that small, civilian-oriented firms can play in defense tech. For at least the last fifteen years, the U.S. Department of Defense has tried to spur small firms to contribute to defense innovation, especially as the costs of military technology increase relative to “off the shelf” civilian tech.

Opinions differ on how much of an impact small businesses can make on Pentagon innovation. Jim Hasik addresses several conditions under which we can expect small businesses to do well, and illustrates his case with several examples. In areas with rapidly changing requirements, skill intensive production, and moderately secure knowledge (in terms of patent and trade secret protection), small firms can successfully ally with big firms, which have advantages with capital intensive production, and incremental innovation. Pete Dombrowski and Eugene Gholz, on the other hand, throw water on the idea of off-the-shelf commercial technology by arguing that small businesses face an immense challenge in navigating the byzantine Defense Department bureaucracy. My own work (on the intellectual property aspect) supports that of Dombrowski and Gholz.

But whether, with respect to the defense industry, small firms play a large role, a small role, or a significant role in alliance with large firms, their presence in the broader civilian economy produces different expectations for differently structured defense-industrial bases. The Soviet defense-industrial base never took advantage of small firms, which did not exist in context of Soviet defense procurement. This hardly meant that Soviet industry couldn’t innovate, or that it couldn’t effectively serve its military customers. It does, however, suggest that innovation will take more incremental, capital-intensive forms than in systems (relatively) more friendly to small-firm input.

The Chinese system has developed in a much different manner than the Soviet one, at least since the 1980s. There are plenty of small, innovative Chinese technology firms. However, granting the opacity of the Chinese defense industrial system, there is little to suggest that the PLA relies on small firms for innovation. Rather, the PLA seems to utilize a combination of time worn and novel forms of espionage to remain abreast of the latest military innovations in the United States and elsewhere.

And so it’s not quite obvious yet that Russia and China will “catch up” to the United States in, for example, military robotics technology. The ability to match the U.S. defense industrial base depends on the structure of that base, and it’s not yet clear that either Chinese or Russian industry can produce consistent technological innovation in the same manner as the United States. That said, they may have other advantages that equalize the game in the long term. Moreover, the United States may yet fail to figure out a way to consistently harness the most innovative elements of its tech sector.

Tagged with: FEATURED

RELATED ARTICLES

World War I’s Lesson for China and Japan

 

Former PLA General Xu Caihou to face court martial

 

China to carry huge island building project in Spratlys

 

4 COMMENTS

  1. June 13, 2014 at 7:19 am

    chinese people face like mangoloid hahahaha

    Reply
  • June 14, 2014 at 3:57 am

    Not always the innovator stays up front 10 years down the road. Graphene is one. Also in large components the Chinese is ahead in 3d printing out of high strength state.